Back to E-mail Index
 
 
 
 
There is not much doubt that 401(K) payments have NOT been deductible for years.Two 1998 tax cases speak to this fact.
 
Bussey versus the Queen can be found at http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/tcc/1998/1998tcc961639.html
 
and
 
Kamil versus the Queen can be found at http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/tcc/1998/1998tcc961699.html
The following came from a reader of CENTAPEDE and points out how simple it is to find the fact.
 
At the same time it is "unfair" because some 401(K) or deferred compensation situations are mandatory and the employee has no choice.
------------------------------------------
"Andrew" sent the following.
 
The requirement to add 401(k) contribution to the wages shown on a W-2 has been explicitly mentionned in the tax guide for years.
 
The earliest version I have seen is on the 1996(!) General Guide (line 104) and every year since.
 
And as to using the tax treaty, the only requirement CCRA has is to not consider proceeds from a 401(k) as income to a greater extent than IRS. Since IRS considers ALL proceeds from a 401(K) as income, CCRA is quite free to do the same. This says nothing about contributions, as you brought out.
 
It quite simply, does not make sense (other than to get company matching) for a Cdn resident to contribute to a 401(k), as any tax saving garnered from IRS, will be happily snapped up by CCRA.
 
 
 
 
 -----Original Message-----
From: centapede-admin@lists.belcarra.com [mailto:centapede-admin@lists.belcarra.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 17:30
To: Centapede
Subject: [CEN-TAPEDE] CANADA taxing 401K deductions

I am a U.S. citizen (and recent Canadian citizen as well) residing in Canada and employed by a major company in the US.  My job takes me all over the United States and I choose to live in Canada with my Canadian spouse as a base of operations. I do NOT work in Canada.   As an employee in a U.S. corporation,  I participate in a company retirement /savings plan known as a 401K.  As you are aware, in the U.S., 401K contributions, as well as any interest accrued are not taxed until withdrawal and are then treated as ordinary income.  Well, by the U.S. anyway!   I have recently been advised by Revenue Canada, that such contributions to a US pension plan under 401K are not deductible and thereby increasing my taxable income considerably.
 
What gives?  I was under the impression that the U.S./Canadian Tax Treaty was to prevent double taxation.  If the Canadian government gets the tax going in and the U.S. government as the money is withdrawn,  isn't this double taxation.  What am I missing here?
 
LXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
david ingram replies

 
For all intents and purposes, a US 401K plan is virtually identical to a Canadian Registered Pension Plan.
 
However, the US does NOT recognize a Canadian RRSP or RPP as a tax deduction and Canada does NOT recognize a US 401K or an IRA as a tax deduction.
 
However, the practice of almost every US /CANADIAN tax consultant has been to take the pure W2 slip figure for taxable wages and use that figure when filing a Canadian Income Tax return.
 
This figure is "after" a 401K deduction.
 
Until October 2002, I had never seen this changed by the CCRA.
 
Since then, I have seen or heard of a dozen.
 
And surprizingly, the first one was a US CUSTOMS officer who was married to a Canadian and lived in Canada.  He had been religiously paying tax to Canada since 1995 on his US earnings from the US government.
 
When the Canadian Government decided to go back and tax him on all his 401K income, he came to me for help.
 
The net result was we have got over $30,000 Canadian back because under Article XIX of the treaty, He should never of being taxed on his US Government income while living in Canada.
 
And until today, none of the changed returns had been prepared by our office.
 
However, just to keep us honest, I guess, one of my own was brought to my attention (to really be honest, it was sent to the office several days ago, but I only dealt with it for the first time today).
 
I have filed a form T400 which is a standard notice of objection.
 
The taxation of these amounts by Canada would be totally unfair and there should/must be a treaty item that we can use.
 
You cannot assume by the way that the Canadian Tax officer is familiar with the treaty.  We have more INS and IRS officers changing their returns now after years of dealing with CCRA officers who have told them that they had to pay tax to Canada when the US government employees were clearly exempt under the treaty.
 
The US IRS officer's return did not require me to look into it because I merely excluded  ALL the income and there was no tax.
 
At this point, we are merely filing Notices of Objection to give us time to research the matter and form a "bulk" appeal.
 
It is obviously a massive problem for everyone such as yourself. It will likely have to be dealt with at the diplomatic level because it "will" result in double taxation as you have suggested.
 
I will be sending a further missive.
 
In the meantime, "YOU" MUST file an official Notice of Objection within 90 days of the date on your notice of assessment or reassessment.
 
If you want to fax us a copy of your assessment to (604) 913-9123, we can put you into the works here. 
 
david ingram - taxman@centa.com
108-100 Park Royal South
West Vancouver, BC, CANADA, V7T 1A2
(604) 913-9133 - (604) 913-9123 www.centa.com
Cell is (604) 657-8451 (10 AM to 10 PM seven days a week)
US / CANADA / MEXICO
Working Visa and
Income Tax Specialists







Copyright  © 1996-2008 david Ingram
All rights Reserved